Home > Economics > Should the Market Monetarists and Gary Gorton be friends? (speculative)

Should the Market Monetarists and Gary Gorton be friends? (speculative)

January 25, 2012 Leave a comment Go to comments

This Timothy Taylor post from last week on Gary Gorton’s very important and fascinating work on the financial crisis reminded me to get back to pursuing a line of thought I started a while ago, about a potentially fruitful analogy between what structured finance products accomplish on the micro level and what the financial sector does at the macro level*. I haven’t come close to thinking this all the way through yet, but I find thinking out loud very helpful sometimes. So please take this in the open spirit of inquiry in which it is offered.

First, Gorton. He has a theory of financial crises that relies on the distinction between information-sensitive and information-insensitive debt. His thought (in its barest form) is that people often have a need for financial assets that they don’t need to worry about how new information affects the possibility of a loss. Then something happens to make those assets information-sensitive, and people sell those assets in droves to reacquire information-insensitive assets. This then wreaks havoc in the repo market, with haircuts on short term secured lending increasing dramatically due to the uncertainty over the pricing of those assets – effectively leading to a net withdrawal from the banking system:

But how do we create safe assets in the first place? The economy is mostly made up of people doing risky things: starting businesses, investing in new factories, opening new divisions or product lines etc. There’s two basic ways you can turn risky things into safe things: diversify, and structure the cashflow pooled through said diversification. In my mind, I have the whole economy as looking like a giant securitisation vehicle, spitting out bank deposits / money market funds at the top and good ol’ equity at the bottom.

Now, how much information-insensitive debt can be produced from a given set of underlying assets is a basically a function of a) the individual riskiness of the assets and b) the correlation of the risks between those assets. (I intend at some point to build a toy model to explain and show this better, but just accept this on epistemological credit for now). If the underlying assets become more risky, or if the correlation between them increases, then that means a reduction in the amount of super-safe, information-insensitive assets that can be spit out the other end.

Now, I wonder what could possibly cause both a) an introduction of risk across the entire economy and b) correlation in those risks. Well, how about a fall in aggregate demand caused by an increase in the demand for money not offset by an increase in the supply of money by the central bank? That (if the Market Monetarists are right) introduces new risks to businesses all over the place, and the risk is highly correlated across the economy. The existing structure of the economy’s cash flows can no longer sustain the same level of super-safe assets, so therefore some previously information-insensitive assets have to become sensitive and you get your crisis a la Gorton.

So when people are talking about a ‘shortage of safe assets’, you either need to restructure the cashflows of the economy to have more loss-absorbency at the bottom to support more quality at the top, or solve the problem of the underlying increase in correlated risk. If this is right, then this seems to me a pretty powerful (but embryotic) theory of how an AD shortfall could cause (or seriously exacerbate) a financial crisis like the one we experienced.

Other assorted thoughts:

  • I think this highlights a key problem with Gorton’s solution to the problem (massive extensions of deposit insurance), which is that it doesn’t in any way do anything to change the amount of super-safe assets the underlying economy can *actually* sustain
  • All the above is not to invalidate all the other potential factors that led to the crisis, (and the chart above seems to  show that the run on the repo market was already beginning by early 2008) but to identify the mechanism whereby it suddenly got a whole lot worse when NGDP (and expectations thereof) fell in mid-summer 2008, and why people are currently saying ‘we still have a shortage of safe assets’
  • Felix Salmon’s question ‘Is information-insensitive debt a good thing‘, is one worth considering very seriously


* I’m very indebted to Arnold Kling, whose mantra “The nonfinancial sector wants to issue risky long-term liabilities and to hold safe short-term assets. The financial sector accommodates this by doing the opposite” first got me thinking down this line

Categories: Economics
  1. January 29, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    You beat me to it! I’ve been meaning to get a post up on that Taylor/Gorton thinking. Great stuff! And the Salmon post is great.

    Felix’s argument supports one I’ve been making of late (on different or at least tangential grounds):

    Just because people want risk-free, interest-generating investment vehicles (read: government bonds) doesn’t mean the government is obligated to provide them.

    They could just issue dollar bills instead of t bills.

  2. July 29, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    I got this website from my friend who shared with me regarding this site
    and at the moment this time I am visiting this web site and reading very informative articles here.

  3. April 11, 2014 at 3:33 am

    As office cleaners, ‘ you gain access to a leading and professional pressure cleaning servicesThere are quite a few professionals.
    This is more beneficial than employing an expert.
    There are different ways to find a good range of options which include everything from a thorough
    top to bottom, you can rely on them to offer their services nationally.
    There are a cleaning services raleigh nc number of
    reasons. You could be worried that you may choose to
    keep it looking new for years to come.

  4. September 23, 2014 at 7:48 am

    Je ρeux vous diure qսe ce n’est pas erroné ..

  5. December 6, 2014 at 8:24 pm

    Une foօs de pluѕ un excellent article, je pensе en parler das la joսrnéе avec des

  6. February 4, 2015 at 7:23 pm

    ʟ’intégralité de ces articleѕ sont effectivement attrayants

  7. February 4, 2015 at 7:41 pm

    Sսjet carrément attrayant !

  8. February 12, 2015 at 1:52 am

    Je suі ѵenu sur votre post par chance et puis je ne le regrette paas !

  9. brick effect Tiles
    February 18, 2015 at 3:46 am

    Excellent, what a weblog it is! This weblog gives helpful information to us, keep it up.

  10. April 11, 2015 at 5:07 pm

    You will however want to also create custom content for the
    wedding couple’s formal attire. You are going to look and feel like a
    princess on your wedding day and as you make that
    walk down the aisle your prince charming will be waiting.
    Take your time, and keep an open mind to a variety of styles.

  11. June 23, 2015 at 2:11 am

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and
    wanted to say that I’ve truly loved browsing your weblog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing for your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  1. April 12, 2012 at 10:35 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: