Home > Economics > Actually, maybe it is the NGDP after all

Actually, maybe it is the NGDP after all

I’ve gotten a lot of really smart pushback on my claims about the UK economy, and I think I have significantly underestimated what I already believed to be a substantial aggregate demand shortfall. First, here is a comparison of UK NGDP at *basic* prices (to eliminate the VAT distortion, h/t to the most excellent Britmouse) compared to the US:

The NGDP shortfall in the UK is significantly higher than the US. Furthermore, it is worth noting we had no less than *5* consecutive quarters where NGDP feel at an annualised rate of greater than 1%, and the recovery was slower. Essentially, our NGDP collapse was much more drawn out (although in the US it was a little sharper, but my gut that more drawn out is worse, e.g. it’s harder to hoard labour for longer). Given that we are now about 5% further below trend compared to the US, when using this (probably better) measure of UK NGDP, is it really so surprising things are this bad compared to the States? Think of it this way – if nominal spending was relatively lower, is there any reason to think (ceteris paribus) the real GDP/inflation mix would be more favourable? I don’t think there is, and so I put the lower bound of the output gap relative to the US at about 2%. The total output gap is likely substantially larger.

The second thing that has made me change my mind is I see pretty much no plausible explanation in the data for why we would have had a large productivity shock. At least, it’s not anything remotely near as important as getting more NGDP, pronto.

This is really important. The idea that the output gap is small in the UK is going to make our monetary policy decisions even worse (including how the central bank would react to changes in fiscal policy, given the inflation mandate). Could there be a supply side issue? There could be a small one. But when we look at the NGDP (and inflation) correctly, I think it should be very clear where our priorities lie. And fiscal policy would have its effect highly diminished by the central banks reaction function (which is biased towards low inflation) if it believes the output gap is small. I think it may be time to start making some noise on this.

Also, I said in my previous post that I didn’t buy the post-Keynesian debt story because NGDP was so similar, and there hasn’t obviously been more deleveraging than the US and it couldn’t explain the discrepancy. So, in order to preserve consistency, given this change to my beliefs about relative NGDP, I have moved my subjective probability estimates somewhat in the direction of that explanation. I currently put sticky wages pretty low on my list. I do think sticky prices are the problem (prices clear markets, after all) but I’m now somewhat more agnostic as to which price that is. Which is all the more reason to plump for NGDP (level) targeting.

Further lessons:

1) Be very, very careful with inflation and NGDP data, in both choosing the correct dataset and how to interpret it

2) Be very, very careful which base years you use for indices

3) Other people are smarter than you are. Listen to them.

About these ads
Categories: Economics
  1. Long
    May 2, 2012 at 7:10 am

    Fitting “trends” is a dangerous exercise. US was, possibly, on a higher trend path before the crisis and there is no reason to believe that the boom years trend in US or UK was sustainable. So it is not clear at all what the right “trend” level is for UK or US.

    Leaving the trends aside, the gap between US and UK NGDP growth is sensitive to the choice of the starting point. If we were to start that chart in late 2005 and 2006 the difference would be much smaller (?) and would flip sign a few times during the crisis.

  2. ferridder
    June 25, 2012 at 2:35 pm

    Maybe it is clearer if you align the peaks?

  3. August 24, 2014 at 11:25 am

    Hello, its good piece of writing on the topic of media print, we all be aware of media is
    a fantastic source of data.

  4. April 5, 2015 at 9:19 am

    One day recently a temporary postal employee from another branch substituted at “my” branch.
    These footwear can be accessed easily from both online and offline sports stores.
    This issue without delay reversed within second year.

  5. April 20, 2015 at 2:25 pm

    Spider – Pro has a patented ball-joint system that allows the camera
    a calculated freedom of movement so the system doesn’t seem so
    rigidly bolted to your body. In specific tricky situations, in case you do want to override the Intelligent Automatic function and make adjustments yourself, this
    model of Panasonic Lumix digital camera lets you do it – which can be more than might be said for
    final year’s ZS3. Pixels are the elements on the sensor that capture the details of the objects
    being photographed.

  1. June 7, 2012 at 5:49 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: